
Wells Fargo, SoFi, and what feels like every institution with a legal team and a Bloomberg terminal is racing to issue their own stablecoin. Meanwhile, the CLARITY Act is stuck in Senate purgatory while Trump is posting about it on Truth Social, Kraken just became the first crypto firm ever granted a Federal Reserve master account, and Galaxy and Avalanche tokenized a CLO in a way that might just be a preview of what the entire financial system looks like in a decade.

๐ RWA market cap was up ~2% WoW to just under $27 billion
๐ Biggest RWA winner: Circle's USYC added 14% to nearly $2 billion, almost entirely on BNB Chain
๐ Biggest network winner: BNB Chain
๐ Stablecoin market is back above $300 billion, up 0.5% WoW
๐ Biggest stablecoin + network winner: USDC added $1.2 billion on Ethereum
Honorable mention: Base, which has led every other chain in stablecoin transfer volume every month since January
๐ Onchain risk-free rates:
- Short-term treasuries (1m): 3.7%
- Aave / DeFi: 2.9%
Fourth consecutive week that onchain rates are running meaningfully below the risk-free rate. Borrow accordingly.
CLARITY Where Art Thou?

Trump went to Truth Social this week to post something very Trump about the CLARITY Act, calling out the banks trying to block it and demanding that market structure legislation get done ASAP. The post was chaotic and correct.
The CLARITY Act remains deadlocked in the Senate Banking Committee. Polymarket has it at roughly 60% odds to pass this year, better than the sub-50% it was sitting at during peak stalemate but well below the 75% spike after the OCC published its guidance a few weeks back. That guidance, by the way, was not great. More noise has followed since, including clarification from FDIC Chair Travis Hill that FDIC insurance will not extend to stablecoins. That is the right call and actually a gift to the banks, whether they realize it or not.
Here is what the banking lobby is missing: FDIC pass-through insurance on a tokenized bank deposit is a genuinely differentiated product. No pure stablecoin issuer can match it. Let stablecoins compete on yield, rewards, and programmability. Let tokenized deposits compete on insurance and institutional trust. The market is big enough for both. Get out of the way and build the product.
Morgan Stanley Files for a Crypto Trust Bank Charter
Morgan Stanley filed for a national crypto trust bank charter with the OCC this week, the same charter that Anchorage currently holds and that Fidelity pursued with Fidelity Digital Assets. On first read this seems strange. Morgan Stanley is already a bank. Why do they need a new charter?
The answer is organizational hygiene. The new entity gets a specific digital asset mandate without creating what one article covering this called "interpretive friction" in the supervisory relationship of the main institution. Translation: spin up a clean legal entity, give it a clear mandate for digital asset custody and stablecoin issuance, and keep the compliance organization of the main bank from losing its mind.
Think of it as Morgan Stanley's version of Erebor. The digital assets subsidiary can move faster, operate under a purpose-built charter, and build out tokenized asset and stablecoin support without pulling the mothership into every regulatory conversation. It is the right structure, and another major player officially entering the fray.
Kraken Gets a Federal Reserve Master Account (First Ever for Crypto)
This is a big one. Kraken has been granted a Federal Reserve master account, making them the first crypto firm in history to receive one. The entity that received it is based in Wyoming, which is both a meaningful detail and a major win for the state as it continues its push to become the Delaware of digital assets.
What does a Fed master account actually mean? Direct access to Fedwire. No more relying on intermediary banking partners for settlement. Faster, cheaper, more direct rails for both institutional and retail clients. And notably, this was not a first-mover gift. Multiple crypto firms had applied. Kraken was just the first to actually get it.
In the same week, Kraken announced a partnership with Nasdaq to launch global tokenized stock trading, building on their ownership of Bakkt and its X-Stocks platform, which already holds around $300 million in tokenized equities. The partnership targets European and international markets with a 2027 launch horizon. The most interesting part is that Nasdaq wants holders to have actual shareholder rights through ownership of the tokenized version, including voting and dividends. That is a meaningful departure from the current structure of most tokenized equity products, which are essentially total return swaps or notes on the underlying, not the underlying itself.
Digitally native issuance with full shareholder rights passthrough is the end state everyone in this space is building toward. Kraken and Nasdaq taking a real shot at it is worth watching closely.
The Stablecoin Naming Hall of Shame
This week's new entrants: SoFi with "SoFi USD" and Wells Fargo with "WFUSD."
SoFi USD is fine. Generic, forgettable, entirely appropriate for something that will mostly live invisibly inside their consumer lending products. WFUSD, however, is a missed opportunity of historic proportions. Adding a single letter would have created the greatest bank-issued financial instrument in the history of finance. WTFUSD. Free marketing. Instant meme.
More seriously, the proliferation of stablecoins raises a legitimate design question: when every GENIUS-compliant stablecoin issuer has essentially the same risk profile and reserve structure, what actually differentiates? The answer is distribution and rewards. Expect the knife fight to play out through points programs, merchant integrations, and yield boosts for certain behaviors, not through walled gardens that prevent switching. The credit card industry is the right mental model. Visa and Mastercard did not win by locking you in. They won by being everywhere and making the rewards good enough that you did not want to leave.
The bigger infrastructure question is what the UX looks like when there are forty USD-denominated stablecoins living in the same wallet. The honest answer is that some kind of agent layer that picks the optimal stablecoin for your situation, optimizing across rewards, risk, and venue compatibility, is probably where this ends up. The human manually navigating between WFUSD, SoFi USD, USDC, PYUSD, and their bank's deposit token is not going to be a thing.
The Galaxy CLO: This Is What Financial Infrastructure Actually Looks Like
We sat down with Olivia Vande Woude, who recently became Avalanche's head of tokenization, to dig into the Galaxy CLO that just launched on Avalanche. It is worth spending real time on this one because it is a preview of what capital markets infrastructure might look like at scale in the very near future.
A CLO, or collateralized loan obligation, is a securitized pool of loans sold to investors in tranches with different risk and return profiles. Galaxy packaged a credit facility to Arch Lending, a crypto lending platform backed by Galaxy Ventures that offers consumer loans overcollateralized with Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other digital assets. You deposit BTC, you borrow dollars against it. Simple product, real demand, proven collateral.
What Galaxy and Avalanche built underneath the structure is where it gets interesting. In a traditional CLO you have an asset manager, a trustee, a collateral administrator, a paying agent, and usually a handful of other counterparties, each operating in their own system, each seeing only their slice of the picture, and each running on their own reporting cadence. In practice this means collateral monitoring happens monthly, signals travel slowly, and by the time the right person knows something is going wrong, you have already burned through the buffer. In credit, lag is the mechanism of loss.
The Galaxy CLO collapses all of that. Anchorage Digital Bank wears four hats simultaneously: bond trustee, qualified custodian, collateral agent, and administrative agent, all through their Atlas Settlement Network, providing real-time collateral monitoring and secure onchain settlement throughout the lifecycle of the transaction. Accountable provides a live dashboard showing both onchain and off-chain loan performance, not monthly, but continuously, visible to every party simultaneously. All of it settles on Avalanche, making the entire history immutable and permanently auditable.
Olivia called this "vertical compression": five or six handoffs between disparate counterparties collapsed to zero.
When one of Arch's borrowers stops paying or gets liquidated, that information propagates immediately. CLO investors can see it happen in real time. Pricing adjusts continuously instead of at month-end data dumps. There is no version of the same collateral being double-pledged to multiple lenders simultaneously, which is the failure mode that cost J.P. Morgan $170M in the Tricolor collapse, while First Brands revealed similar off-balance-sheet fraud.
The stress in private credit right now is not primarily a credit cycle story. It is an information architecture failure. Funds lending to software companies are sitting on assets whose cashflow assumptions AI is actively repricing. That is a business model risk. The tokenized Galaxy CLO is not doing that. It is lending against over-collateralized Bitcoin and Ethereum with real-time onchain collateral monitoring. You cannot hide the collateral. You cannot double-pledge it. You cannot bury a liability in a footnote. The architecture is built as an answer to the failure modes currently playing out elsewhere in private credit.
INX tokenized the debt tranches on Avalanche, with positions expected to be listed on INX's ATS platform (a wholly owned subsidiary of Republic) offering market access for qualified investors. NAV Consulting is providing fund administration. Grove, an institutional-grade credit infrastructure protocol within the Sky ecosystem (formerly MakerDAO), incubated by Grove Labs, a subsidiary of Steakhouse Financial, came in as the anchor investor at $50 million. This builds on Grove's initial $250M deployment into tokenized assets on Avalanche and reflects an ongoing institutional credit strategy on the network. The CLO is currently financed to $75M with a ceiling of $200M. The senior tranche carries a coupon of SOFR +570 bps with monthly distributions. At this stage it is primarily a buy-and-hold structure with a December 2026 maturity, so secondary volume will be modest for now. That said, the infrastructure is built, and when the next issuance scales and the buyer base broadens, the rails will be ready.
If structured credit had been built with this kind of collateral transparency in 2008, the information lag that amplified the crisis may have looked very different.
Shoutout: SuperState's First Onchain IPO
SuperState is facilitating a tokenized IPO for Backpack, the Solana wallet and trading platform, at a $1 billion valuation through SuperState's Opening Bell product. This is SuperState's first actual IPO as opposed to tokenized listings they have done previously. Rob Leshner has had this ambition since the early days of the company, and a truly digitally native first IPO is a significant moment for both SuperState and the broader ecosystem.
Watch or listen to the full episode on Spotify.

![[โโโโโโโ]: To the Moon โ(ยฐ0ยฐ)โ](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fstorage.ghost.io%2Fc%2Fdf%2F2c%2Fdf2c7059-8617-4d25-9617-996aea279325%2Fcontent%2Fimages%2F2026%2F06%2FProgress-Bar-5.jpg&w=3840&q=75)

