[███░░░░]: The Wackos in the Newsroom

Welcome to the TAC's Progress Bar, where we distill the relevant tokenization news from the week into a few hundred words. Delivered to your inbox in time for Friday happy hour in NYC (usually).

This edition of the Progress Bar focuses entirely on a legend and someone I've looked up to for over a decade.

He is a six-time author and spent eighteen years at The Wall Street Journal. He co-authored The Age of Cryptocurrency, the 2015 book that did more than perhaps anything else to make Bitcoin legible to a TradFi audience. He advised MIT's Digital Currency Initiative, ran the CoinDesk newsroom when it broke the story that ultimately brought down FTX, chaired Consensus, and now chairs the Decentralized AI Society while serving as Chief Content Officer of the RWA Summit.

We start with Argentinian currency devaluation and finish with self sovereign AI. A summary of the conversation is below and you can watch or listen to the full thing here.

Before we dive in let's go through last week's metrics.

Market KPIs (brought to you by RWA.xyz)

📈 RWA market cap was up 0.7% WoW to $38.1 billion
🏆 Biggest RWA winner: Figure HELOC Token (FIGR_HELOC) added $264M
🏆 Biggest network winner: Ethereum added $307M

📈 Stablecoin market cap was up 0.1% WoW to $296.2 billion
🏆 Biggest stablecoin winner: Tether USDt (USDT) added $412M
🏆 Biggest network winner: Ethereum added $290M

📈 Onchain risk free rates:
SOFR: 3.65%
Aave / DeFi: 3.34%

The most prestigious (and selective) gathering of CEOs, investors and institutions is back! RWA Summit's flagship event will be in Brooklyn on September 1st and 2nd.

Apply to attend here and be sure to list me or TAC as your referral. If approved, use discount code TAC25 at checkout for 25% off your ticket price

---

It all started in Argentina

What I didn't know until this conversation is that Bitcoin wasn't Michael's entry point. Argentina was.

He lived there for six years, covering the collapse of the one-to-one dollar peg. The peso lost about 75% of its value overnight. He covered the debt restructuring fight between Argentina, the IMF, hedge funds, and, memorably, Italian pensioners who'd bought Argentine bonds in dollars and were being offered pennies. Then the government responded to the wreckage by printing, and by slapping on capital controls that trapped his family's savings in a country they no longer lived in. That story is in the book, used as a metaphor for what happens when trust in a system breaks down.

So he got invited to a dinner in 2013 with Jeremy Allaire, Barry Silbert, Raj Date, a few VCs, and a couple of other journalists. Someone turned to him and said, "You lived in Argentina. Imagine if that monetary problem you've been fixated on for so long was resolved by a mathematical function that no incoming government could undo." It landed instantly.

"And that's when I just went: wow. Okay. I think I get it."

He had the emotional framework for Bitcoin years before he read a word of the whitepaper. He also notes that Argentina punches well above its weight in producing people who've shaped this industry. Wences Casares is the obvious example, and the guy who talked me out of law and into Bitcoin in about forty-five minutes at a San Francisco Starbucks.

"The wackos in the newsroom"

Michael and his co-author Paul Vigna were, in his words, "looked upon as the wackos in the newsroom."

Their vehicle was a daily column called BitBeat, which lived inside the Money Beat blog, which lived inside WSJ.com, which sat well below the actual newspaper, which sat below the front page. He described it as "layers down the hierarchy of significance." They just kept publishing anyway.

The only time senior editors got interested was when Newsweek ran its infamous story claiming Dorian Nakamoto was Satoshi. The bosses wanted the scoop. Michael and Paul thought it was exactly the wrong thing to care about, and kept writing about substance instead.

From my side of that era, I can tell you it mattered more than the org chart suggests. I was doing BD at Xapo, trying to sell custody to hedge funds that didn't want to own the asset in the first place. Michael and Paul's writing was one of the few things we could hand to a serious institution and say read this. It carried the Journal's credibility into rooms we couldn't otherwise get into.

He tried to build RWAs in 2015 and hit a wall

Long before "tokenization" was a word people used, Michael was working on property deeds onchain. He was influenced by Hernando de Soto, the Peruvian economist who argued that provable property rights are the foundational layer of any functioning capitalist system. Where records get lost, destroyed, or bought off, nobody can borrow against anything.

He went further than real estate. He wanted communities to spin up solar microgrids, prove the power generation, and borrow against those returns to fund more solar. That's DeFi logic applied to physical infrastructure, roughly a decade early.

Two things killed it. The tech wasn't there, since this predated the token standards entirely. And the moment you had a productive asset generating a return, you had a security, and that was the end of the conversation.

He's now an advisor to Propy, doing residential real estate onchain. What Propy has done that the early attempts couldn't is map the smart contract structures all the way through to existing real estate law. That alignment work is, as Michael put it, "a common story for so much of this space," and it's exactly what TAC members are grinding through in credit, treasuries, and fund structures today.

What's actually changed

Michael has lived through four crypto winters. He does not get swept up. So when he says the current legitimization is "quite striking," I take it seriously.

The marker he points to isn't BlackRock tokenizing funds. It's BlackRock getting behind the Bitcoin ETF. That was the moment a name synonymous with traditional finance put its brand on something that had been dismissed as criminal money for a decade.

He's also refreshingly unromantic about it. He recounted a regional bank telling him, "Just to be clear, we're not really interested in the token stuff. We just like the blockchain." Twelve years in, that's still a live mindset.

The concentration risk nobody's talking about

The sharpest thing in the whole conversation: roughly 94% of tokenized equity trades clear through a single broker-dealer, Alpaca.

Michael's point isn't that Alpaca is a problem. They're excellent, and they're speaking at the Summit. It's why the concentration exists: nobody else raised their hand. The rules require a regulated entity to perform a role that a well-designed onchain system might not need at all, and only one firm stepped up.

"It's a function of antiquated regulation."

That's a structural vulnerability sitting underneath a market that's growing fast, and it won't resolve until the rules do.

What he's excited about at the Summit

The one he's most animated about is the permissioned-versus-permissionless question, staged as deliberate contrast. Neha Narula of MIT Digital Currency Initiative will present research (funded in part by Kinexys, JPMorgan's blockchain unit) on public blockchains for banking, set against Yuval Rooz of Canton on why permissioned has been a runaway success with banks. Separate sessions, juxtaposed on purpose. His read: the conclusions genuinely aren't definitive, and that's healthy.

Also confirmed: Jeremy Allaire (Circle) on keynote, Lynn Martin (NYSE) on 24/7 trading, Dan Doney (DTCC), Thomas Sy of New York Life Investment Management (a top-30 global asset manager), and Samara Cohen (BlackRock). Sessions on tokenized equities, onchain credit, and vaults as a new form of fund management, plus a significant Washington regulator he couldn't name yet.

The framing he keeps returning to: is TradFi absorbing DeFi, or is this a merger of equals?

---

Stay ahead of the curve

Be sure to follow us on X, LinkedIn, and Spotify for real-time updates, behind-the-scenes insights, and the occasional hot take that didn't make it into the Progress Bar or the First Trillion podcast episode or summary.

Until next week,

The TAC Team